Who Will Win Super Bowl 46?

I admire the way the New York Football Giants have marched through the postseason. You can pretty much toss out their up-and-down regular season results at this point. In the postseason, the Giants punched Atlanta and Green Bay in their mouths, then went toe-to-toe with San Francisco in a heavyweight fight of a football game. The 49ers blinked first, in overtime, when exhaustion and inexperience tend to manifest as game changing mistakes. Just like in 2007, when the underdog Giants unexpectedly ripped through the playoffs and into the Super Bowl, these G-Men are back in the big game. And they’ll be facing, nominally anyway, the same opponent.

You can’t really call this a rematch; too much has changed in four seasons. And just as the Giants are a better team now than in the fall, so too are the New England Patriots. During the regular season the Patriots were cursed with a “bad” defense that gave up big yards; it’s cursed them all the way to 15 wins and a Super Bowl berth. Total yardage surrendered is a near-worthless stat. Think about it – how many yards is a defense willing to concede after it’s up by three scores? A team that scores early and often is liable to be in that position. Although the statistical sample is small – two games – New England in the playoffs has held opposing quarterbacks to a passer rating of 74.05.

“Yeah, but one of those games was against Denver and Tebow,” you say.

Oh, you mean the same Tim Tebow who chucked it for 316 yards and two touchdowns against the supposedly tough, Dick Lebeau-coached Pittsburgh defense in the wild card round? (That included the game winner in overtime.) Don’t get me wrong, Tebow’s not a world beater, but before the Broncos were blown out in Foxboro, a lot of people thought that if he could light up Pittsburgh, he could at least keep Denver close in a shootout with Tom Brady. Didn’t happen.

Not only that, but Brady had a dreadful game a week later against Baltimore, and the Patriots still won. Sure, they got lucky in the end, but the New England defense managed to hold the Ravens to 20 points, this on a day when Joe Flacco was otherwise throwing the ball well and the Baltimore offense was controlling the clock.

The Giants’ D has been equally impressive. It shut down the entire Falcon offense, then the Packers’ formidable passing game. Eli Manning, meanwhile, took shot after shot from the 49ers and hung tough, while receiver Victor Cruz played an exhausting game, doing everything he could to get open and catch the ball. The team plays hard for its coach and it’s hard not to appreciate the effort and execution (especially when they’re often been so lacking in the past few years).

Super Bowl 42 (Giants 17, Patriots 14) was one of the all time upsets, a 16-0 Team of Destiny versus a wild card underdog that didn’t belong. If those teams played ten games, the Patriots would win nine. The 2007 Giants were one of the weakest NFL champions in history, but they took down Goliath when no one (besides them) expected it.

This year is nothing like that. New England doesn’t seem invincible, and the Giants – even though they were 9-7 – seem like the “hot” team because they’ve turned their game around in the playoffs. (Note: Teams that make the Super Bowl are usually on some kind of hot streak.) There’s no “nobody believes in us” factor from outside; many people actually expect the Giants to win this game. (The betting line is Patriots by three.)

Still, I keep coming back to that Patriots’ defense – the one everyone expects will suck. That coupled with a sharp performance by Brady will spell defeat for the G-Men. They’ll have to play flawlessly to score another “upset.” I think the Patriots will win – and I think the margin will be bigger than expected.

The Pick: Patriots by 9.

This entry was posted in Sports and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Who Will Win Super Bowl 46?

  1. en4cer24 says:

    You can’t be serious right? I read this all the way up to the Tim Tebow stat against the Pittsburgh Steelers defense. That stat line is inflated. For one, an experienced and very seasoned veteran was out due to his health. Second, the defensive line was in a shell of themselves. Injuries were a major factor in the line’s decimation. You can’t get adequately pressure the quarterback when you’re running with your second team. Now, New England on the other hand had just about all of their defensive starters healthy as I recall. That and they had already ripped the Broncos earlier in the season. So “ripping” as you so eloquently stated in your drivel above is an aberration of sorts. Had Pittsburgh been completely healthy, that wouldn’t have happened, I assure you.

    Second of all, the New York Giants team you labeled as not belonging in the 2007 playoffs and possibly the weakest Super Bowl champion of them all, did in fact belong. They played the Patriots to a 38-31 loss in the last game of the season, showing that they could indeed match them offensively at least. Then they stopped a hot Brett Favre who had one of his cowboy moments, shooting from the hip and getting intercepted for his effort to end the Packers season in OT at Lambeau. This is a feat they have since duplicated, only with Aaron Rodgers leading this years version. The weakest champion I can think of is the Pittsburgh Steelers over the Seattle Seahawks. Now there is a weak champion.

    This should have been a longer piece. Especially seeing as you neglected to mention the state of the Steelers defense. I’m sure you will argue your piece and I wouldn’t be surprised. In fact I would be shocked and dismayed if you didn’t.

    • en4cer,

      Pittsburgh’s defense wasn’t “decimated,” they had some injuries. Polamalu, Farrior, Woodley and Harrison (among others) all played in that game. Injuries happen to all teams, and certainly the Steelers had some, but decimated they were not. Ike Taylor played one of the worst games I’ve ever seen him play. Anyway the Packers won a Super Bowl with a ridiculous number of players on injured reserve last year – no excuse.

      I never said the Giants didn’t belong in the playoffs in 2007. They qualified. Statistically they were an anomaly but they got the job done. All I’m saying is this year’s Giants aren’t huge underdogs like in ’07. In fact this year’s team is much better and I wouldn’t be surprised to see them win on Sunday. Enjoy the game!

  2. en4cer24 says:

    Uh, yeah partner, you did. Either way you slice up the below excerpt, you said it:

    Super Bowl 42 (Giants 17, Patriots 14) was one of the all time upsets, a 16-0 Team of Destiny versus a wild card underdog that didn’t belong.

  3. en4cer24 says:

    On other thing before I part, Pittsburgh proved in a prior year that underdog teams do win. They were the first six seed to win the big game, no longer making it an anomaly but a trend.

  4. I see, you got me – but I meant (in that sentence) that the Giants were perceived as not in the same company as the Patriots of ’07, i.e., they weren’t “supposed” to be in the big game but proved otherwise. (Perception only.) I know, semantics. Probably should have worded that better.

    The 2005 Steelers were four point favorites vs. Seattle.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s